Greg Stein wrote on Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 15:49:10 -0500: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 15:44, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> wrote: > > On 02/06/2012 03:41 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > >> That is certainly an easier approach. "You use the old interface? > >> Fine. You won't get base checksum verification cuz we'll always pass > >> NULL." ... that seems like a fine position to take. > > > > This might be a fine position to take for some third-party consumer of the > > APIs, but I hope you aren't advocating that we toss out such a core data > > integrity check within Subversion itself. Are you? > > Theoretically, we'll be converted over to Ev2 and the compatibility > shim will not be used in our product. Only third-parties who choose to > stick to the old Ev1 (delta editor) interfaces will lose the integrity > check. >
And Subversion 1.7 clients. > Ev2 only has checksums for the resulting content. It uses > path/revision to specify the target of the text change. > > Cheers, > -g
