Greg Stein wrote on Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 17:26:59 -0500: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 17:13, Daniel Shahaf <danie...@elego.de> wrote: > > Greg Stein wrote on Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 17:06:54 -0500: > >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 15:55, Daniel Shahaf <danie...@elego.de> wrote: > >> > Greg Stein wrote on Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 15:49:10 -0500: > >> >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 15:44, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > On 02/06/2012 03:41 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > >> >> >> That is certainly an easier approach. "You use the old interface? > >> >> >> Fine. You won't get base checksum verification cuz we'll always pass > >> >> >> NULL." ... that seems like a fine position to take. > >> >> > > >> >> > This might be a fine position to take for some third-party consumer > >> >> > of the > >> >> > APIs, but I hope you aren't advocating that we toss out such a core > >> >> > data > >> >> > integrity check within Subversion itself. Are you? > >> >> > >> >> Theoretically, we'll be converted over to Ev2 and the compatibility > >> >> shim will not be used in our product. Only third-parties who choose to > >> >> stick to the old Ev1 (delta editor) interfaces will lose the integrity > >> >> check. > >> >> > >> > > >> > And Subversion 1.7 clients. > >> > >> Are you talking about 'svn', or something like TortoiseSVN? The former > >> will use Ev2, so the shim won't be used. The latter will not get the > >> additional integrity check if it continues to use the Ev1 interfaces. > > > > I am talking about svn 1.7.0 --- how will it use Ev2? > > Hunh? Not at all. Ev2 won't be used in svn until 1.8 at the very > earliest, but more likely 1.9. > > What am I missing about your question? Ev2 is simply nowhere in 1.7.x. >
1. Third-parties who use Ev1 interface would lose the integrity check. 2. Subversion 1.7 uses, and will use, Ev1 interfaces. Therefore: 3. Subversion 1.7 would lose the integrity check. Correct? > Cheers, > -g
