On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 9:24 AM Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 4:47 AM Julian Foad <julianf...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Julian Foad wrote: >> > Ha ha! It's laugh-out-loud ugly, that teeny-tiny viewport... >> >> I hope my sense of humour was not badly misjudged. Seeing that Mark wrote >> it "Looks good" without any smiley, maybe everyone else is not seeing what >> I saw. The attached screenshot shows how it renders in Firefox. >> >> I genuinely was delighted to see it working at all. >> > > I was using an iPad. I do not know if it was the smaller screen or if iOS > does something to make the iFrame "fit" but in general it looked fine. > Looking at it now on my desktop I see the same tiny viewport as you. > > In general iFrame's are gross and a source of problems, but they are also > super convenient so I get it. I was mainly happy to see the info come > together and assume there are ways it can be finessed into looking better > on various browsers. Since we have SSI's available that seems like an easy > initial solution to avoid needing the iFrame. > > -- > Thanks > > Mark Phippard > http://markphip.blogspot.com/ > The "responsive iframes" technique described at the following page works with things like embedded YouTube videos to size the frame correctly for desktop and mobile: https://blog.theodo.fr/2018/01/responsive-iframes-css-trick/ Maybe it will help in this case too. <http://markphip.blogspot.com/> >
