Den tis 6 juli 2021 kl 03:39 skrev Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name>:
> Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Sat, Jul 03, 2021 at 00:05:49 +0200: > > Den sön 27 juni 2021 kl 23:36 skrev Daniel Shahaf: > > > Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 23:14:20 +0200: > > > > Den sön 27 juni 2021 kl 20:34 skrev Daniel Shahaf: > > > > Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Sat, 26 Jun 2021 21:12 +00:00: > > There are additiona links for the years 2010, 2011, 2012, 2014, 2015 and > > 2016 (in http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/general.html) > > which I cannot find at all in the current elegosoft.com site. > > > > However "... meets in Berlin for a Hackathon once a year: 2016, 2015, > ..." > > doesn't seem very current. For this reason I'd suggest to remove the > > complete paragraph from HACKING. Other option to rephrase "in the past > ... > > met in Berlin" and link to archive.org. > > > > I prefer not to remove the paragraph; it's a useful historical perspective. > > > > - Modify the link to point to elego's old site via archive.org. Pro: > "As > > > it > > > > was supposed to be" Con: That page ( > > > > > > > > https://web.archive.org/web/20171206002300/https://www.elegosoft.com/en_US/page/nachlese-subversion-hackathon-berlin-2013 > > > ) > > > > contains links to the interviews, but those links are 404. > > > > - Keep the link, but mark it as obsolete. Pro: No re-writing of > history. > > > > Con: We loose some part of history. > > > > - Copy the contents from archive.org and host it including the > > > interviews > > > > on the site or in WIKI. Pro: Preserve history. Con: Copyright issue > needs > > > > to be resolved with elego (and whoever took the photos). > > > > > > Fifth option: > > > > > > - Link to elego's page in archive.org, and mirror the interviews (with > > > permission, if one is needed) > > > > > > > I thought about this but I couldn't invent a way to inject the interviews > > within archive.org and thus it didn't provide a good user expericen, > which > > is why I didn't list this as an option. > > > > It's not the best UX, agreed, but it preserves all available content, > and in English. Let's see what others think. > Thanks for your feedback. I've not heard from anyone else so for now I've updated the above links to point to archive.org in r1891737 and rephrased slightly. Kind regards, Daniel
