On 2/24/10, Jason Ryan <[email protected]> wrote: > markus schnalke wrote: >> Maybe one should list all WMs that see dwm as their primary influence. >
> It points to a deficiency in the way Wikipedia views notability: it is > quite at odds with the notion of influence and derivation that powers > free and open source software... i don't know about the policy of wikipedia but it seems to me it is full of irrelevant articles ..and i don't see why would that hurt anyone the dwm article often got out of sync with the project and it had lots of false info, meanwhile it got translated into 10 languages for me this shows that it was not the developers who maintained it but ppl who cared enough ..i thought that's the definition of being a relevant article anyway i don't really care about that article much, it just seems odd to me that they want to delete it now
