Well, that's exactly the point. Wikipedia is trying to artificially enforce notability, which is of course going to fail miserably...
On 2/24/10, Charlie Kester <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed 24 Feb 2010 at 07:15:42 PST hiro wrote: >>It seems like this guy is just mocking wikipedia's notability guideline. > > After reading the discussion, I'm beginning to wonder about wikipedia's > notability. If it's not mentioned on cat-v.org, it's not worth knowing > about. ;) > > If wikipedia deletes articles like the one on dwm, it will just be that > much less interesting to me. > >
