That's actually my point - wikipedia is artificially enforcing notability so we should artificially create notability.*
*Not a serious suggestion. On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:26 PM, hiro <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, that's exactly the point. > Wikipedia is trying to artificially enforce notability, which is of > course going to fail miserably... > > On 2/24/10, Charlie Kester <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed 24 Feb 2010 at 07:15:42 PST hiro wrote: > >>It seems like this guy is just mocking wikipedia's notability guideline. > > > > After reading the discussion, I'm beginning to wonder about wikipedia's > > notability. If it's not mentioned on cat-v.org, it's not worth knowing > > about. ;) > > > > If wikipedia deletes articles like the one on dwm, it will just be that > > much less interesting to me. > > > > > >
