Hi Frank
ok. but should be a property of the smarttag imho
why the choice of violet by default ?
this has been defined in the specification of this feature:
http://specs.openoffice.org/appwide/SmartTags/Smart_Tags_Specification.odt
i'll read it againts this specifi popint
I fear that we'll have problems due to the contrast
Assigning different colors for different smart tag types is a possible
enhancement of this feature which is not covered by the specification.
Feel free to file a RFE for this.
I'll do asap, thx
Well, my response will be political
We are actually fighting against MSOXML iso certifiation and FUD
against ODF
Using sime MS xml tags, even if we are allowed (what about IP ?), will
give weapons to our oponents
let me again explain this. The MOSTL smart tag extensions is nothing but
a prove of concept, originally written by Jakob Lechner, the external
contributer who initiated the project. Having MOSTL xml files read by a
special smart tag component is only one of the million possibilities
what you can do with smart tags. This has nothing to do with the smart
tag API, it's just *one* possible use case. You wouldn't blame the
Writer API that it can be used to import Word xml files, would you?
Yes i caught it
But as FUD is FUD and our competitors are expert FUDers, this should be
stated clearly every time it is used " it can be used to import Word
xml files" and the ewample given as this
We then shlould define our own example to avoid attacks
(did i say the problem was only political and not technical ?)
Laurent
--
Laurent Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Ingénierie OpenOffice.org -
http://www.indesko.com
Nuxeo Enterprise Content Management >> http://www.nuxeo.com -
http://www.nuxeo.org
Livre "Programmation OpenOffice.org", Eyrolles 2004-2006
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
