Of course we are all pleased to see new people making contributions to Synapse (to be politically correct, WS-Commons Transport in this case). However I have to say that Irantha probably didn't choose the easiest part of the code to contribute his first patch. As you know I have already contributed multiple improvements to the JMS transport, but there are still things that definitely need improvement and where I didn't have the courage yet to start implementing the changes.
Obviously in Open Source projects in can happen that people are working on the same thing without being aware of it. I know that Asankha already started to work on JTA quite some time ago (see e.g. [1]). I guess that the right approach here is to let Asankha propose his patch and then to evaluate together what is the best solution. Andreas [1] http://markmail.org/message/o4r6hgznm5ca3c5g On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 23:32, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Are you in sync with what Irantha is doing? >> >> No.. I started looking into this over the last week.. and I got a good hold >> of things, so I went on implementing.. > > I think it would be polite to give Irantha a chance to improve his > code and work on this. As far as I know he has spent a lot of time > looking at transactions for JMS and this is / will be his first patch > for Synapse. I don't think we should miss the opportunity to encourage > new developers to get involved and submit patches. > > Paul > > -- > Paul Fremantle > Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2 > Apache Synapse PMC Chair > OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair > > blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
