Hi Indika, On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:10 PM, indika kumara <indika.k...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Have u tested multiple instances ... ? as names are random , a name is > different for same endpoint in each synapse instance .. States are > replicated based name + some ID for an endpoint... > I haven't tested this thoroughly. But from what you are saying I feel that there are issues in this area. If generating UUIDs for endpoint names causes problems with clustering scenarios, then I would say we should stop generating names for in-lined endpoints. We should leave anonymous endpoints as they are and it should be up to the user to properly name endpoints when implementing a clustered scenario (like in 1.2 days). Still IMO, forcing the user to name endpoints is not the right solution. Thanks, Hiranya > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka <hiranya...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:48 AM, indika kumara <indika.k...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> ... So with randomly generated names , clustering should not work >>> >> >> No it works. At least I haven't encountered any issues thus far. >> >> Thanks, >> Hiranya >> >> >>> >>> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:17 PM, indika kumara <indika.k...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>> Indika, we generate UUIDs for endpoint names. So it is unique :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> OK ... But for clustering , 100% endpoint configurations should be equal >>>> in each server instance ... But how can do with randomlely generated names >>>> .... ? ... >>>> >>>> Indika >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Hiranya Jayathilaka >> Software Engineer; >> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org >> E-mail: hira...@wso2.com; Mobile: +94 77 633 3491 >> Blog: http://techfeast-hiranya.blogspot.com >> > > -- Hiranya Jayathilaka Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org E-mail: hira...@wso2.com; Mobile: +94 77 633 3491 Blog: http://techfeast-hiranya.blogspot.com
