I think we all agree that having a meaningful name for any endpoint (in-line or not) is very important and is a production best practice. So I'm still not getting why we are not agreeing to force it, because the disadvantages to the user are greater than the advantages.
Thanks, Supun.. On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:23 PM, indika kumara <indika.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > My point exactly :) We should keep anonymous endpoints around since they >> are very useful. But the best practice should be to properly name all >> endpoints. >> >> Thanks, >> Hiranya >> > > Hiranya ... If you mean that we should avoid the auto generation of the > names and keeps anonymous endpoints 'as-is'. That is the behavior in early > days including the last release. If so... I would like to add something .. > If the correctness of the operation is critical such as clustering and if > the user has not specified the name , we should warn or exit. > > Thanks > > Indika > > -- Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc http://wso2.org supunk.blogspot.com
