On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:02 PM, indika kumara <indika.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I do not want to prove that I am correct… But as per my experience, a > meaningful name always helped me a lot to track the issue when things go > wrong and to check the correctness of the behavior when did some > modifications on endpoint codes. > > At first time in early days in synapse, I really preferred using in-lined > unnamed endpoints. However, when I was working in endpoint codes, when try > to find a solution for a user problem; a meaningful name really helped me a > lot. Based on those experiences, I always try to use names … > My point exactly :) We should keep anonymous endpoints around since they are very useful. But the best practice should be to properly name all endpoints. Thanks, Hiranya > > Thanks > Indika > > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka > <hiranya...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi Indika, >> >> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:10 PM, indika kumara <indika.k...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Have u tested multiple instances ... ? as names are random , a name is >>> different for same endpoint in each synapse instance .. States are >>> replicated based name + some ID for an endpoint... >>> >> >> I haven't tested this thoroughly. But from what you are saying I feel that >> there are issues in this area. If generating UUIDs for endpoint names causes >> problems with clustering scenarios, then I would say we should stop >> generating names for in-lined endpoints. We should leave anonymous endpoints >> as they are and it should be up to the user to properly name endpoints when >> implementing a clustered scenario (like in 1.2 days). >> >> Still IMO, forcing the user to name endpoints is not the right solution. >> >> Thanks, >> Hiranya >> >> >>> >>> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka < >>> hiranya...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:48 AM, indika kumara >>>> <indika.k...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> ... So with randomly generated names , clustering should not work >>>>> >>>> >>>> No it works. At least I haven't encountered any issues thus far. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Hiranya >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:17 PM, indika kumara >>>>> <indika.k...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Indika, we generate UUIDs for endpoint names. So it is unique :) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> OK ... But for clustering , 100% endpoint configurations should be >>>>>> equal in each server instance ... But how can do with randomlely >>>>>> generated >>>>>> names .... ? ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Indika >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Hiranya Jayathilaka >>>> Software Engineer; >>>> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org >>>> E-mail: hira...@wso2.com; Mobile: +94 77 633 3491 >>>> Blog: http://techfeast-hiranya.blogspot.com >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Hiranya Jayathilaka >> Software Engineer; >> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org >> E-mail: hira...@wso2.com; Mobile: +94 77 633 3491 >> Blog: http://techfeast-hiranya.blogspot.com >> > > -- Hiranya Jayathilaka Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org E-mail: hira...@wso2.com; Mobile: +94 77 633 3491 Blog: http://techfeast-hiranya.blogspot.com
