> > Please don't forget that there is people out there using Syncope core > *without* (or not exclusively via) the admin console. > Currently, they only needs the syncope-client dependency (+Spring if they > want to rely upon RestTemplate) in their java apps. > > Moreover, some client classes (the exception handler, for example) are not > just model objects (like as *TO and *Mod). > > Give these reasons, I would either leave things as they are (the current > client > module, with current classes inside) or introduce a new common as said > above. > > I actually don't see an option to rename common to client and re-introduce > client at later stage; besides the rest, it generates some confusion IMHO. >
OK. I agree with you. > Regards.
