+1, most of the other Apache projects I work on have already switched to git.
Colm. On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Fabio Martelli <[email protected]> wrote: > Il 02/10/2014 09:51, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: > >> Hi all, >> as you know we are already using the R/O git / github mirror for our SVN >> repository. >> >> I was wondering if it is time for Syncope (as many other project did like >> Camel, Karaf, CXF...) to move to GIT. >> I don't want to enter into any FUD about SVN Vs GIT, but I'd say that GIT >> would be particularly useful for merges among different versions and for >> better management of feature branches. >> >> If we decide for this switch, we will also have to understand how to deal >> with site management (currently managed via svnpubsub) and also with our >> non-completely-standard SVN layout (with particular reference to >> /committers [1] content which looks not needed anymore / out-of-date). >> >> WDYT? >> Regards. >> >> [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/syncope/committers/ >> >> I completely agree. > +1 > F. > > -- > Fabio Martelli > > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > Apache Syncope PMC > http://people.apache.org/~fmartelli/ > > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
