Hi all,
it seems we have consensus here: I am going to open an issue on JIRA to
INFRA with the following requests:
1. switch our source repo to GIT
2. make the current SVN directory read-only ONLY for
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/syncope/trunk
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/syncope/branches
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/syncope/tags
3. re-map our read / only GIT mirrors [1] [2] to our new GIT repo
4. adjust everything to intercept pull requests from github
Regards.
[1] http://git.apache.org/syncope.git
[2] http://github.com/apache/syncope
On 05/10/2014 00:11, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
+1, most of the other Apache projects I work on have already switched to
git.
Colm.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Fabio Martelli <[email protected]>
wrote:
Il 02/10/2014 09:51, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
Hi all,
as you know we are already using the R/O git / github mirror for our SVN
repository.
I was wondering if it is time for Syncope (as many other project did like
Camel, Karaf, CXF...) to move to GIT.
I don't want to enter into any FUD about SVN Vs GIT, but I'd say that GIT
would be particularly useful for merges among different versions and for
better management of feature branches.
If we decide for this switch, we will also have to understand how to deal
with site management (currently managed via svnpubsub) and also with our
non-completely-standard SVN layout (with particular reference to
/committers [1] content which looks not needed anymore / out-of-date).
WDYT?
Regards.
[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/syncope/committers/
I completely agree.
+1
F.
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
