Hi Francesco, sorry for missing the exact point of the switch from SVN to Git, but probably good that we have discovered that the SVN repository is still writable with such a simple change.
Do we have any special rules / instructions of working with the new Git repository? The branch strategy probably stays the same, right? (e.g. a change is committed/pushed to the relevant branch, then is possibly merged to branches with higher versions and the trunk) Cheers, Guido > Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2014 um 09:28 Uhr > Von: "Francesco Chicchiriccò" <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Time to switch to GIT? > > Hi all, > quick update: as reported in this comment [1], GIT is working but some > other things need to be fixed: in particular it seems that Subversion is > still accepting commits, thus generating a very unstable situation. > > I have asked INFRA for support: please in the meanwhile *don't commit > anything to Subversion*, thanks. > > Regards. > > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-574?focusedCommentId=14178065&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14178065 > > On 06/10/2014 10:01, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > > FYI, I've opened INFRA-8435 and SYNCOPE-559 for this. > > > > Regards. > > > > On 06/10/2014 09:35, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> it seems we have consensus here: I am going to open an issue on JIRA > >> to INFRA with the following requests: > >> > >> 1. switch our source repo to GIT > >> > >> 2. make the current SVN directory read-only ONLY for > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/syncope/trunk > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/syncope/branches > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/syncope/tags > >> > >> 3. re-map our read / only GIT mirrors [1] [2] to our new GIT repo > >> > >> 4. adjust everything to intercept pull requests from github > >> > >> Regards. > >> > >> [1] http://git.apache.org/syncope.git > >> [2] http://github.com/apache/syncope > >> > >> On 05/10/2014 00:11, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > >>> +1, most of the other Apache projects I work on have already > >>> switched to > >>> git. > >>> > >>> Colm. > >>> > >>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Fabio Martelli > >>> <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Il 02/10/2014 09:51, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi all, > >>>>> as you know we are already using the R/O git / github mirror for > >>>>> our SVN > >>>>> repository. > >>>>> > >>>>> I was wondering if it is time for Syncope (as many other project > >>>>> did like > >>>>> Camel, Karaf, CXF...) to move to GIT. > >>>>> I don't want to enter into any FUD about SVN Vs GIT, but I'd say > >>>>> that GIT > >>>>> would be particularly useful for merges among different versions > >>>>> and for > >>>>> better management of feature branches. > >>>>> > >>>>> If we decide for this switch, we will also have to understand how > >>>>> to deal > >>>>> with site management (currently managed via svnpubsub) and also > >>>>> with our > >>>>> non-completely-standard SVN layout (with particular reference to > >>>>> /committers [1] content which looks not needed anymore / > >>>>> out-of-date). > >>>>> > >>>>> WDYT? > >>>>> Regards. > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/syncope/committers/ > >>>>> > >>>>> I completely agree. > >>>> +1 > >>>> F. > > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > Involved at The Apache Software Foundation: > member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC > http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > >
