great - thanks everybody. Let's get these two fixes in and close the release. Until that point, please no new features. The version number 0.9 is fine with me since it's not really a pure maintenance release as many new features went in too. Down the road, however, we need to think about release branches.
Regards, Matthias From: Mike Dusenberry <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 01/11/2016 10:47 AM Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release Hi Luciano, I'd like to commit SYSTEMML-217, which should be done today, as part of the 0.9 release. - Mike On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:35 AM Deron Eriksson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Luciano, > > In the JIRA comments, Matthias asked yesterday if I could commit a fix for > SYSTEMML-330 before the release. I am looking at it now. Since it needs to > be coded and tested, I probably don't think I would be ready today. Perhaps > a Tuesday or Wednesday release might allow some updates like this? > > Also, any reason for 0.9 instead of 0.8.1? > > Deron > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I would like to volunteer as RM for the next SystemML release, which I > > propose we call it 0.9. > > > > > > I was planning to start the process later today, unless there is any > > blocking issue that folks are working on and would like to get it in > before > > the release. > > > > Let's use this thread to coordinate any issues needed for the release. > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > -- Mike Dusenberry GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry Sent from my iPhone
