Hi all, As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this week and the release SystemML 0.9 looks good to me :)
Thanks, Niketan Pansare IBM Almaden Research Center E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar From: Mike Dusenberry <dusenberr...@gmail.com> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 01/14/2016 06:49 PM Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release The DML Language Reference would be great to have as well. Also, in general, I think we should only have the Javadocs for end-user facing code, such MLContext, rather than for any deep internals that a user is not going to interact with. On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:26 PM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > What should be the minimum documentation to add to the release distribution > ? > > Currently we have : > docs/README.txt > docs/SysteML_Algorithms_Reference.pdf > > I was planning to add the javadocs as well. > > But I still think we have much more available in trunk that we could add... > > Suggestions are welcome... > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Also, for fixed jiras, I did the following query : > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27 > > > > And was wondering if we could all move this to 0.9 release. > > > > Could someone please help me verify. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> great - thanks everybody. Let's get these two fixes in and close the > >>> release. Until that point, please no new features. The version number > 0.9 > >>> is fine with me since it's not really a pure maintenance release as > many > >>> new features went in too. Down the road, however, we need to think > about > >>> release branches. > >>> > >> We can create release branches now, or from the tag when we need a 0.9.1 > >> for example. As we are not a large project with tens of prs coming very > >> quick, I would recommend to create the branch as needed for minor > releases. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Luciano Resende > >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende > >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > -- Mike Dusenberry GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry Sent from my iPhone.
