Thank you all guys for responses. I've created new branch 0.8.0. https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tajo.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/branch-0.8.0
- hyunsik On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:30 PM, CharSyam <[email protected]> wrote: > +1!! > > > 2014-02-20 10:27 GMT+09:00 ktpark <[email protected]>: > > > +1 ! > > > > 2014. 2. 20., 오전 10:26, Jinho Kim <[email protected]> 작성: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > -Jinho > > > > > > > > > 2014-02-20 10:12 GMT+09:00 JaeHwa Jung <[email protected]>: > > > > > >> +1! :) > > >> > > >> > > >> 2014-02-20 10:00 GMT+09:00 Min Zhou <[email protected]>: > > >> > > >>> +1 for the approach. > > >>> > > >>> Min > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Jihoon Son <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> +1! > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 2014-02-20 9:50 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>: > > >>>> > > >>>>> There remain few issues for 0.8. After 0.8, we will refactor > resource > > >>>>> manager, scheduler, and the design of worker part for multi-tenancy > > >>>>> support. For this, we need to separate the branches right now. If > > >> there > > >>>> are > > >>>>> no objection, I'll create a branch for 0.8. The remain issues for > 0.8 > > >>>> will > > >>>>> be merged to both 0.8 and master branches. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> - hyunsik > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Henry, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I appreciate for correcting my wrong statements. You are right. We > > >>> will > > >>>>>> release 0.8 three months after 0.2 release. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I don't think that we want to release 0.8 before potential > > >>> graduation, > > >>>>> and > > >>>>>> it may be hard to do so even if we want. This is because there > > >> still > > >>>>> remain > > >>>>>> some critical issues that we cannot postpone anymore. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> The main objective of my claim aforementioned is to make two > > >> branches > > >>>> for > > >>>>>> development after 0.8 release. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>> Hyunsik > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Henry Saputra < > [email protected] > > >>> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Hi Hyunsik, I think you meant will release 0.8 three months after > > >>> 0.2 > > >>>>>>> release? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Do we want to release 0.8 quickly before potential graduation > > >> VOTE? > > >>>>>>> If we do then maybe we could remove the more issues, such as the > > >>>>>>> sub-tasks and improvement, and keep only blocking issues. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Henry > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected] > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> I'm rescheduling non-critical issues scheduled in 0.8 to next > > >>>> release. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I'm considering the next release versions. So far, we have had > > >>> long > > >>>>> term > > >>>>>>>> for each release. We released 0.2 seven months after incubation. > > >>> We > > >>>>> also > > >>>>>>>> released 0.8 three months after 0.2 release. It is because Tajo > > >>> has > > >>>>> been > > >>>>>>>> heavy under development status. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Tajo 0.8 seems a product ready level. I'm expecting that there > > >>> would > > >>>>> be > > >>>>>>>> additional use cases on products. In order to support them, we > > >>> need > > >>>> to > > >>>>>>>> release Tajo more frequently with hotfixs. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> So, I would like to propose the develpment based on two > > >> branches, > > >>>>> which > > >>>>>>> one > > >>>>>>>> is 0.8.x branch and 1.0 branch (master branch in git). 0.8.x > > >>> branch > > >>>>>>> will be > > >>>>>>>> frequently released with hotfixes and new lightwight features. > > >> 1.0 > > >>>>>>> branch will > > >>>>>>>> be developed for a complete system. It will embrace even radical > > >>>>> changes > > >>>>>>>> and new features. The next major release, probably 0.9, would be > > >>>>>>> branched > > >>>>>>>> from 1.0 branch. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> If you have any idea, feel free to suggest. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> - hyunsik > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:30 AM, JaeHwa Jung < > > >> [email protected]> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Sorry guys, I missed prerequisite. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> 2014/1/20 JaeHwa Jung <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 for your idea. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> I also think that this is right time for 0.8 release. > > >>>>>>>>>> As you mentioned, too time-consuming jobs need to fix for > > >> next > > >>>>>>> release. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> And we need to check 0.8 document again because there are not > > >>>> some > > >>>>>>> basic > > >>>>>>>>>> features for users. For example, there is nothing about > > >> hadoop > > >>>>>>> version. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> 2014/1/18 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks, > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> It seems to be right time to think about the 0.8-incubating > > >>>>> release. > > >>>>>>>>>>> Please take a look at the 0.8 roadmap and the current > > >> resolved > > >>>>>>> issues. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> - 0.8 Roadmap > > >>>>>>>>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/tajo/Roadmap > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> - 0.8 unresolved issues > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.8-incubating%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Most of scheduled feature are all implemented. Some issues, > > >>>>>>> push-based > > >>>>>>>>>>> transmission and improvement of intermediate data, are > > >>>> unresolved > > >>>>> so > > >>>>>>>>>>> far. However, in my point of view, they are not critical in > > >>> this > > >>>>>>> time. > > >>>>>>>>>>> I think they can be scheduled to next release. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Although there are still bugs listed in 0.8 unresolved > > >> issues, > > >>>> we > > >>>>>>> will > > >>>>>>>>>>> resolve most of them soon if we concentrate on bug fix. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> So, if you agree, I would like to suggest to prepare 0.8 > > >>>> release. > > >>>>> I > > >>>>>>>>>>> just listed some issues which must be resolved for 0.8 > > >> release > > >>>> at > > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-512. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I will wait your idea and suggestion. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hyunsik > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>> Jaehwa Jung > > >>>>>>>>>> Bigdata Platform Team > > >>>>>>>>>> Gruter > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>> Jaehwa Jung > > >>>>>>>>> Bigdata Platform Team > > >>>>>>>>> Gruter > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Jihoon Son > > >>>> > > >>>> Database & Information Systems Group, > > >>>> Prof. Yon Dohn Chung Lab. > > >>>> Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, > > >>>> Korea University > > >>>> 1, 5-ga, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu, > > >>>> Seoul, 136-713, Republic of Korea > > >>>> > > >>>> Tel : +82-2-3290-3580 > > >>>> E-mail : [email protected] > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> My research interests are distributed systems, parallel computing and > > >>> bytecode based virtual machine. > > >>> > > >>> My profile: > > >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/coderplay > > >>> My blog: > > >>> http://coderplay.javaeye.com > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Thanks, > > >> Jaehwa Jung > > >> Bigdata Platform Team > > >> Gruter > > >> > > > > >
