Thanks, Hyunsik! -Jinho
2014-02-22 4:09 GMT+09:00 Henry Saputra <[email protected]>: > Sorry for late response Hyunsik. > > Thx for creating new branch for 0.8 release. > > - Henry > > On Thursday, February 20, 2014, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thank you all guys for responses. > > > > I've created new branch 0.8.0. > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tajo.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/branch-0.8.0 > > > > - hyunsik > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:30 PM, CharSyam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1!! > > > > > > > > > 2014-02-20 10:27 GMT+09:00 ktpark <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > +1 ! > > > > > > > > 2014. 2. 20., 오전 10:26, Jinho Kim <[email protected]> 작성: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > -Jinho > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-02-20 10:12 GMT+09:00 JaeHwa Jung <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > >> +1! :) > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> 2014-02-20 10:00 GMT+09:00 Min Zhou <[email protected]>: > > > > >> > > > > >>> +1 for the approach. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Min > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Jihoon Son <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> +1! > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> 2014-02-20 9:50 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> There remain few issues for 0.8. After 0.8, we will refactor > > > resource > > > > >>>>> manager, scheduler, and the design of worker part for > > multi-tenancy > > > > >>>>> support. For this, we need to separate the branches right now. > If > > > > >> there > > > > >>>> are > > > > >>>>> no objection, I'll create a branch for 0.8. The remain issues > for > > > 0.8 > > > > >>>> will > > > > >>>>> be merged to both 0.8 and master branches. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> - hyunsik > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Hyunsik Choi < > [email protected] > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Henry, > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> I appreciate for correcting my wrong statements. You are > right. > > We > > > > >>> will > > > > >>>>>> release 0.8 three months after 0.2 release. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> I don't think that we want to release 0.8 before potential > > > > >>> graduation, > > > > >>>>> and > > > > >>>>>> it may be hard to do so even if we want. This is because there > > > > >> still > > > > >>>>> remain > > > > >>>>>> some critical issues that we cannot postpone anymore. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> The main objective of my claim aforementioned is to make two > > > > >> branches > > > > >>>> for > > > > >>>>>> development after 0.8 release. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Regards, > > > > >>>>>> Hyunsik > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Henry Saputra < > > > [email protected] > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Hi Hyunsik, I think you meant will release 0.8 three months > > after > > > > >>> 0.2 > > > > >>>>>>> release? > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Do we want to release 0.8 quickly before potential graduation > > > > >> VOTE? > > > > >>>>>>> If we do then maybe we could remove the more issues, such as > > the > > > > >>>>>> >
