+1 for java7 for now. I think there is not much we cannot do with java7 neither.

LieGrue,
strub





> On Friday, 28 November 2014, 18:38, Romain Manni-Bucau 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 2014-11-28 18:24 GMT+01:00 Andres Almiray <[email protected]>:
>>  AFAIK JDK8 should be the baseline as it can *force* the hand for adoption,
>>  yes, this is desired.
>>  Otherwise we'll be stuck in JDK7 or even worse, JDK6.
>> 
> 
> well my humble opinion is that is we stick to java 8 we'll not be
> adapted by other projects before few years (and surely for an
> important enterprise projects as well)
> 
>>  JDK8 also opens the door for additional design features such as
>> 
>>   - static methods on interfaces
> 
> Not a blocker IMO
> 
>>   - default methods
> 
> IMO we shouldn't use it in the API - means it is not good enough or
> too complicated or not correctly "layered" - and for the impl not a
> bloker neither
> 
>>   - repeatable annotations
> 
> Does it change anything for us (api/impl)? As a user I see but java 7
> would support it as well.
> 
>>   - usage of Optional
> 
> Good one
> 
> 
> Excepted last one we can surely handle by very few reflection I see no
> blocker to support java 7. Moving is slow and enough libs didnt move
> yet to consider it IMHO (why I started this thread)
> 
> 
>> 
>>  Cheers,
>>  Andres
>> 
>>  -------------------------------------------
>>  Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast
>>  http://jroller.com/aalmiray
>>  http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray
>>  --
>>  What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator.
>>  There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and
>>  those who don't.
>>  To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion.
>> 
>>  On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
> <[email protected]>
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>>  Hi guys,
>>> 
>>>  just checkouted sources and seems project targets java 8. Don't we
>>>  want to support java 7 as well? Otherwise it can be a blocker for
>>>  adaption I think
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>  @rmannibucau
>>>  http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>  http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>  https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to