I agree with Java 8 On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Andres Almiray <[email protected]> wrote:
> AFAIK JDK8 should be the baseline as it can *force* the hand for adoption, > yes, this is desired. > Otherwise we'll be stuck in JDK7 or even worse, JDK6. > > JDK8 also opens the door for additional design features such as > > - static methods on interfaces > - default methods > - repeatable annotations > - usage of Optional > > Cheers, > Andres > > ------------------------------------------- > Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast > http://jroller.com/aalmiray > http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray > -- > What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator. > There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and > those who don't. > To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion. > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > just checkouted sources and seems project targets java 8. Don't we > > want to support java 7 as well? Otherwise it can be a blocker for > > adaption I think > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > -- Otávio Gonçalves de Santana blog: http://otaviosantana.blogspot.com.br/ twitter: http://twitter.com/otaviojava site: *http://about.me/otaviojava <http://about.me/otaviojava>* 55 (11) 98255-3513
