Le 28 nov. 2014 19:51, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > +1 for java 8 as the default. > > We don't want this brand new thing looking old because it's based on an > older JVM. Java 8 adoption is also really up there, per[1]. >
I dont get the point we can support it being java 7 without too much workaround (only will be optional afaik) > For components you're stuffing into app servers, it's a little harder, > since you do have to be Java 7 compliant for EE 7 (you can go lower, but > not higher). > > [1]: http://jaxenter.com/java-2-111936.html > > On Fri Nov 28 2014 at 12:27:40 PM Andres Almiray <[email protected]> wrote: > > > AFAIK JDK8 should be the baseline as it can *force* the hand for adoption, > > yes, this is desired. > > Otherwise we'll be stuck in JDK7 or even worse, JDK6. > > > > JDK8 also opens the door for additional design features such as > > > > - static methods on interfaces > > - default methods > > - repeatable annotations > > - usage of Optional > > > > Cheers, > > Andres > > > > ------------------------------------------- > > Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast > > http://jroller.com/aalmiray > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray > > -- > > What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator. > > There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and > > those who don't. > > To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion. > > > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < [email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > just checkouted sources and seems project targets java 8. Don't we > > > want to support java 7 as well? Otherwise it can be a blocker for > > > adaption I think > > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > @rmannibucau > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > >
