Le 28 nov. 2014 19:51, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> +1 for java 8 as the default.
>
> We don't want this brand new thing looking old because it's based on an
> older JVM.  Java 8 adoption is also really up there, per[1].
>

I dont get the point we can support it being java 7 without too much
workaround (only will be optional afaik)

> For components you're stuffing into app servers, it's a little harder,
> since you do have to be Java 7 compliant for EE 7 (you can go lower, but
> not higher).
>
> [1]: http://jaxenter.com/java-2-111936.html
>
> On Fri Nov 28 2014 at 12:27:40 PM Andres Almiray <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> > AFAIK JDK8 should be the baseline as it can *force* the hand for
adoption,
> > yes, this is desired.
> > Otherwise we'll be stuck in JDK7 or even worse, JDK6.
> >
> > JDK8 also opens the door for additional design features such as
> >
> >  - static methods on interfaces
> >  - default methods
> >  - repeatable annotations
> >  - usage of Optional
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Andres
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast
> > http://jroller.com/aalmiray
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray
> > --
> > What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator.
> > There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary,
and
> > those who don't.
> > To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion.
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
[email protected]
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > just checkouted sources and seems project targets java 8. Don't we
> > > want to support java 7 as well? Otherwise it can be a blocker for
> > > adaption I think
> > >
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau
> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau
> > >
> >

Reply via email to