I thought it was accepted - at least on jira. Is it only historical code? That said we surely want a light factory of jul logger to be able to switch impl if needed. Le 3 janv. 2015 14:42, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Hi! > > I've seen we have plenty of logging frameworks in our core now. > I did already remove this once as I suggest to only use the > java.util.logging.Logger facade. > > Of course I'm aware that jul logger sucks. But we just use it as facade > really. There are plenty of frameworks to use this facade. > > I especially disklike slf4j in container projects because > a.) it often creates classloader issues > b.) there have been binary incompatible changes in the past. That might > create NoClassDefFound and other bad situations within customer project. > > So I suggest we really go back to jul only. > > > LieGrue, > strub >
