Is there something wrong in using Log4J, especially V2 that has a decent separation of API and connectors similar fo SLF4J?
Unless we wanted to minimize external dependencies, JUL is there not just since Java 8? Werner On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > I've seen we have plenty of logging frameworks in our core now. > I did already remove this once as I suggest to only use the > java.util.logging.Logger facade. > > Of course I'm aware that jul logger sucks. But we just use it as facade > really. There are plenty of frameworks to use this facade. > > I especially disklike slf4j in container projects because > a.) it often creates classloader issues > b.) there have been binary incompatible changes in the past. That might > create NoClassDefFound and other bad situations within customer project. > > So I suggest we really go back to jul only. > > > LieGrue, > strub >
