+1 for modules It sounds more familiar with e.g. DeltaSpike. I remember JavaMoney had the notion of "extras" vaguely inspired by that ThreeTen-extra where JSR 310 put all the (sometimes as important as say Holidays;-D) stuff it did not feel capable of adding to Java 8 on top of all the other huge load. ThreeTen is fairly monolithic, even too much to break out a decent piece that works with Java ME Embedded or saves space in SE Embedded, thus I understand why it did not bother using a term like "modules", but even JavaMoney later renamed that to "lib" or "libraries". Similar for the current approach by JSR 363.
So I'd use either "modules" or something like "lib" not "extras". Werner On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > IMO it 100% depends on dependencies. I'm used to do a "big" extras > using all API until EE then another module by external dependency - > just to avoid to have 1 bval, 1 jaxrs etc...and finally just 2-3 > classes by jar but 1 module by additional dependency works well as > well. > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2015-01-06 8:10 GMT+01:00 Oliver B. Fischer <[email protected]>: > > Just a short naming question: Everything what does not belong to api and > > core belongs > > > > a) to module or > > b) to extras? > > > > Anatole used module and I pushed my stuff to extras. > > > > Bye, > > > > Oliver > > > > -- > > N Oliver B. Fischer > > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > > P +49 30 44793251 > > M +49 178 7903538 > > E [email protected] > > S oliver.b.fischer > > J [email protected] > > X http://xing.to/obf > > >
