For me, given that we switched to Java 8 (in the branch currently), there is nothing that speaks against using/adding Optional support in the API IMO... Other opinions?
2017-09-21 13:52 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>: > Hi > > I was wondering, would it make sense for Tamaya to handle within its core > usage of Optional? Its required by MP, however the code looks a bit > disjointed in how it works. The method MicroprofileConfig. > getOptionalValue > looks elegant, but it seems there's no handling of the optional values > properly in the producer method. > > John > -- *Anatole Tresch* PPMC Member Apache Tamaya JCP Star Spec Lead *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* *maketechsimple.wordpress.com <http://maketechsimple.wordpress.com/> * *Twitter: @atsticks, @tamayaconf* *Speaking at:* [image: JSD_Speaker_2017][image: J-Con 2017 logo][image: JVM Con]
