Could you give us a pseudo example, please? Currently the question is a little bit to broad fir me.
Oliver Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 21.09.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Anatole Tresch <[email protected]>: > > For me, given that we switched to Java 8 (in the branch currently), there > is nothing that speaks against using/adding Optional support in the API > IMO... > Other opinions? > > 2017-09-21 13:52 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>: > >> Hi >> >> I was wondering, would it make sense for Tamaya to handle within its core >> usage of Optional? Its required by MP, however the code looks a bit >> disjointed in how it works. The method MicroprofileConfig. >> getOptionalValue >> looks elegant, but it seems there's no handling of the optional values >> properly in the producer method. >> >> John >> > > > > -- > *Anatole Tresch* > PPMC Member Apache Tamaya > JCP Star Spec Lead > *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* > *maketechsimple.wordpress.com <http://maketechsimple.wordpress.com/> * > *Twitter: @atsticks, @tamayaconf* > > *Speaking at:* > > [image: JSD_Speaker_2017][image: J-Con 2017 logo][image: JVM Con]
