Hm, looking at the code now I think you are right that is doesn't make
such sense.
Oliver
Am 29.09.17 um 14:36 schrieb John D. Ament:
I'm not sure I got that 100% but replicating the API only made sense when
you were not targetting the Java 8 runtime. Now that Java 8 is the minimum
why not use the core concepts?
BTW, it'll probably make sense to have support for generic types in general.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 5:17 AM Anatole Tresch <[email protected]> wrote:
We we should not use Optional and instead of duplicate the API in our
framework, whereas the JDK already provides it?
For me that makes no sense...
Looking forward to your thoughts.
J Anatole
2017-09-28 22:06 GMT+02:00 Oliver B. Fischer <[email protected]>:
core
--
*Anatole Tresch*
PPMC Member Apache Tamaya
JCP Star Spec Lead
*Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
*maketechsimple.wordpress.com <http://maketechsimple.wordpress.com/> *
*Twitter: @atsticks, @tamayaconf*
*Speaking at:*
[image: JSD_Speaker_2017][image: J-Con 2017 logo][image: JVM Con]
--
N Oliver B. Fischer
A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
P +49 30 44793251
M +49 178 7903538
E [email protected]
S oliver.b.fischer
J [email protected]
X http://xing.to/obf
