On 17-Sep-07, at 6:41 PM, Daniel Jue wrote:
Having the templates with an html extension allows easier integration
with you preferred html editor, such as Dreamweaver. ("edit with")
Whereas you may want xml documents opened with Notepad++ (Great, by
the way), etc.
If anything, they should be .xhtml documents.
Fair enough. I'd rather have them as .xhtml docs, to be precise.
Another problem might be that some browsers may not have their mime
types properly set--about the only mime type you can guarantee to work
is for html. I think xml and xhtml are delivered as something other
than text usually.
That one's wierd, though, since the .html extension isn't seen by the
browser. Url's are of the form:
http://www.blah.foo.com/context/my/component/path/parameter
there's no .html that I can see, so the only need for an extension is
on the development side, unless I'm missing something.
This is pretty old, but check out:
http://www.ookingdom.com/design/xhtml
Cool! I'll check it out.
Christian.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
