So now that we're talking about validating templates and stuff.. would it be too bad to plug bug TAPESTRY-1600 for namespace support?? Anyone else interested?? vote on it. :)
ps - the patch is there too, so you can merge it and try it out yourself. Kevin Menard wrote: > I'd prefer .xhtml, although if both .html and .xhtml could be used, I don't > see that being terrible. It wouldn't really be configurable -- Tapestry > would just add both to its search path. > > That way, those needing .html for their tools would be all set, and those > wanting .xhtml for validation (e.g., in IntelliJ IDEA) would also be all > set. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
