... but would be harmless, right? On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Igor Drobiazko <igor.drobia...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would see 5.1.0 as version of TML and not of Tapestry. Not necessarily > every Tapestry version brings new template features. Having a 5.2.0.xsd > without any new features feels strange. > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Alex Kotchnev <akoch...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It would seem that now that T 5.2 is officially released the official >> version of the xsd in templates would be bumped to 5.2.0 . However, >> switching the template version to tapestry_5_2_0.xsd breaks templates. This >> behavior is somewhat confusing and inconsistent - even if 5_2_0 has no >> significant changes it should at least be possible to use it in the >> template >> declaration. >> >> All examples in the documentation use tapestry_5_0_0.xsd >> or tapestry_5_1_0.xsd. >> >> Regards, >> >> ALex K >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > > Igor Drobiazko > http://tapestry5.de >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
