For what it is worth, this caused me some confused. If the TML version was something like 1.1 then it would seem independent. However, it is so close to the version of Tapestry that using TML 5.1.0 when you are using Tapestry 5.2.4 looks like something is out of sync.
Mark On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Igor Drobiazko <igor.drobia...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would see 5.1.0 as version of TML and not of Tapestry. Not necessarily > every Tapestry version brings new template features. Having a 5.2.0.xsd > without any new features feels strange. > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Alex Kotchnev <akoch...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It would seem that now that T 5.2 is officially released the official >> version of the xsd in templates would be bumped to 5.2.0 . However, >> switching the template version to tapestry_5_2_0.xsd breaks templates. This >> behavior is somewhat confusing and inconsistent - even if 5_2_0 has no >> significant changes it should at least be possible to use it in the >> template >> declaration. >> >> All examples in the documentation use tapestry_5_0_0.xsd >> or tapestry_5_1_0.xsd. >> >> Regards, >> >> ALex K >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > > Igor Drobiazko > http://tapestry5.de > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
