Shall I file an issue for this ? Would this be something a committer would be interesting in addressing or is this "below the radar" stuff that's not worth spending time on ?
Regards, Alex K On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Mark <mark-li...@xeric.net> wrote: > For what it is worth, this caused me some confused. If the TML > version was something like 1.1 then it would seem independent. > However, it is so close to the version of Tapestry that using TML > 5.1.0 when you are using Tapestry 5.2.4 looks like something is out of > sync. > > Mark > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Igor Drobiazko <igor.drobia...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I would see 5.1.0 as version of TML and not of Tapestry. Not necessarily > > every Tapestry version brings new template features. Having a 5.2.0.xsd > > without any new features feels strange. > > > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Alex Kotchnev <akoch...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> It would seem that now that T 5.2 is officially released the official > >> version of the xsd in templates would be bumped to 5.2.0 . However, > >> switching the template version to tapestry_5_2_0.xsd breaks templates. > This > >> behavior is somewhat confusing and inconsistent - even if 5_2_0 has no > >> significant changes it should at least be possible to use it in the > >> template > >> declaration. > >> > >> All examples in the documentation use tapestry_5_0_0.xsd > >> or tapestry_5_1_0.xsd. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> ALex K > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > Igor Drobiazko > > http://tapestry5.de > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
