Sadly, I suppose the compatibility issue will stay in peoples' minds until, years from now, Tapestry 6 comes out and is fully compatible with Tapestry 5.9. Or, hey, maybe 5.4 should be named 6.0 just for that reason :-) ... kidding, of course.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:27 AM, CPC <[email protected]> wrote: > And it is sad that in "cons" list it writes "No API backwards compatibility > between major versions" which means community still has that impression. > > On 11 October 2011 17:56, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:19:25 -0300, Robert Zeigler < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Disappointing. He mentions T5 in the beginning, but his example is >>> definitely /not/ T5. >>> >>> Also, his list of examples of companies that use Tapestry was sadly >>> incomplete. Major sites like the oxford dictionary online, for instance, >>> were missing. >>> >> >> Even bigger, the Oxford English Dictionary, the most respected of all. >> >> -- >> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo >> Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, >> and instructor >> Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. >> http://www.arsmachina.com.br >> >> >> ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.**apache.org<[email protected]> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
