I agree 100%. Let's go tapestry 6.
On Oct 11, 2011, at 9:08 PM, "Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:43:15 -0300, Bob Harner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sadly, I suppose the compatibility issue will stay in peoples' minds >> until, years from now, Tapestry 6 comes out and is fully compatible >> with Tapestry 5.9. Or, hey, maybe 5.4 should be named 6.0 just for >> that reason :-) ... kidding, of course. > > Kidding? I think it's a good idea, definitely worth of being discussed. ;) > Even having great, big advancements in documentation, Tapestry is a way > better framework than its own marketing IMHO . . . > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and > instructor > Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. > http://www.arsmachina.com.br > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
