Yeah may be shorter release cycles just like mozilla/chrome? On 12 October 2011 04:11, Lenny Primak <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree 100%. Let's go tapestry 6. > > > > On Oct 11, 2011, at 9:08 PM, "Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo" < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:43:15 -0300, Bob Harner <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Sadly, I suppose the compatibility issue will stay in peoples' minds > >> until, years from now, Tapestry 6 comes out and is fully compatible > >> with Tapestry 5.9. Or, hey, maybe 5.4 should be named 6.0 just for > >> that reason :-) ... kidding, of course. > > > > Kidding? I think it's a good idea, definitely worth of being discussed. > ;) Even having great, big advancements in documentation, Tapestry is a way > better framework than its own marketing IMHO . . . > > > > -- > > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > > Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, > and instructor > > Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. > > http://www.arsmachina.com.br > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
