Some response on licensing but there were other points e.g. the
DISCLAIMER isn't right - relying on automatic determination isn't enough
- and NOTICE is required at the top of a git repo. DEPENDENCIES would be
nice as well.
More to the process point - there are now 2 +1 from the PPMC; that's not
very many out of 11.
PPMC - this is a step on the journey. I hope you can find the time to
look at the release and vote. This is not a step for the mentors to vet
one persons work.
(Mentors - what say you to my comments? Other comments?)
Andy
On 22/06/15 13:50, Pierce, Marlon wrote:
Andy, were your comments addressed from your +0 vote.
Typically also there should be a [DISCUSS] thread separately from the
[VOTE] thread.
Marlon
On 6/22/15, 8:16 AM, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 11/06/15 15:48, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
This seems to have stalled - I'm not sure as to why that is.
What are people's (especially the PPMC) expectations of what happens
when a release is called?
Andy
