On 07-Mar-16 18:48, Willy Aguirre wrote:
Hi!
Hello Willy
Thank you for your interest in the Taverna GSOC issues.
I'm Willy Aguirre from Lima Peru Actually I'm studing at UPC(
http://epe.upc.edu.pe/)
I don't have experience in Workflow System but I used BPMN (Bisagi) I think
is new experience for me.
I'm working as a java developer and also I used Play Framework 1.* it uses
yaml
https://pe.linkedin.com/in/willyaguirre
I passed GSoC 2015 for Apache Aurora
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1164
I'm interesting in these ideas
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAVERNA-881
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAVERNA-879
These two issues (881 and 879) are part of a group
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAVERNA-900 for adding support for
the Common Workflow Language to Taverna. For information about CWL,
please follow the links in the description of 900. GSOC students are
only expected to do one, or maybe two, of the issues - so do not panic :)
I think 879 consists of four sub-tasks.
(a) creating small workflows corresponding to the calling of a single
Taverna activity,
(b) putting a Taverna Command Line Tool that calls a Taverna workflow
into a docker image
(c) creating a CWL configuration for the docker so that the Taverna
workflow can be run as part of a CWL workflow.
The fourth task
(d) extend the CWL reader so that it recognizes CWL processes that wrap
Taverna workflows and re-instate the Taverna workflow (or activity if a
single activity)
depends on someone doing 877 and so obviously may not be done (if no one
does 877) or will require co-ordination.
For 879, I think your proposal would be relatively easy to write as the
issue is well-organized.
881 (saving Taverna workflows as CWL) is less straight-forward and you
would need to put more work into how you would go about achieving the
task, especially how to have testable parts.
For me (and other people will have different opinions), 879 is primarily
a programming issue, but 881 is more "software engineering". Which one
you choose to do will depend on what you would like to get out of GSOC.
As you have already done a programming GSOC, perhaps 879 would be a good
challenge.
The members of the dev mailing list will be able to help advise on any
questions / suggestions you have.
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1164>
Cheers!
Willy
Thanks again for your interest.
<https://pe.linkedin.com/in/willyaguirre>
Alan
