could you give me some steps? I'm reading about CWL 2016-03-13 10:23 GMT-05:00 Willy Aguirre <[email protected]>:
> Thanks for answer! So I prefer to implement CWL > > https://github.com/common-workflow-language > > 2016-03-11 16:28 GMT-05:00 Alan Williams <[email protected]>: > >> On 07-Mar-16 18:48, Willy Aguirre wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >> >> Hello Willy >> >> Thank you for your interest in the Taverna GSOC issues. >> >> I'm Willy Aguirre from Lima Peru Actually I'm studing at UPC( >>> http://epe.upc.edu.pe/) >>> >>> I don't have experience in Workflow System but I used BPMN (Bisagi) I >>> think >>> is new experience for me. >>> >>> I'm working as a java developer and also I used Play Framework 1.* it >>> uses >>> yaml >>> >>> https://pe.linkedin.com/in/willyaguirre >>> >>> I passed GSoC 2015 for Apache Aurora >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1164 >>> >>> I'm interesting in these ideas >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAVERNA-881 >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAVERNA-879 >>> >> >> These two issues (881 and 879) are part of a group >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAVERNA-900 for adding support for >> the Common Workflow Language to Taverna. For information about CWL, please >> follow the links in the description of 900. GSOC students are only expected >> to do one, or maybe two, of the issues - so do not panic :) >> >> I think 879 consists of four sub-tasks. >> >> (a) creating small workflows corresponding to the calling of a single >> Taverna activity, >> >> (b) putting a Taverna Command Line Tool that calls a Taverna workflow >> into a docker image >> >> (c) creating a CWL configuration for the docker so that the Taverna >> workflow can be run as part of a CWL workflow. >> >> The fourth task >> >> (d) extend the CWL reader so that it recognizes CWL processes that wrap >> Taverna workflows and re-instate the Taverna workflow (or activity if a >> single activity) >> >> depends on someone doing 877 and so obviously may not be done (if no one >> does 877) or will require co-ordination. >> >> For 879, I think your proposal would be relatively easy to write as the >> issue is well-organized. >> >> 881 (saving Taverna workflows as CWL) is less straight-forward and you >> would need to put more work into how you would go about achieving the task, >> especially how to have testable parts. >> >> For me (and other people will have different opinions), 879 is primarily >> a programming issue, but 881 is more "software engineering". Which one you >> choose to do will depend on what you would like to get out of GSOC. As you >> have already done a programming GSOC, perhaps 879 would be a good challenge. >> >> The members of the dev mailing list will be able to help advise on any >> questions / suggestions you have. >> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1164> >>> Cheers! >>> Willy >>> >> >> Thanks again for your interest. >> >> <https://pe.linkedin.com/in/willyaguirre> >>> >> >> Alan >> >> > > > -- > Willy Aguirre | @willrre > Blog: http://osgux.tumblr.com/ > Mozilla Rep: https://reps.mozilla.org/u/Willy/ > Mozilla Hispano - Willyaguirre > <https://www.mozilla-hispano.org/documentacion/Usuario:Willyaguirre> > -- Willy Aguirre | @willrre Blog: http://osgux.tumblr.com/ Mozilla Rep: https://reps.mozilla.org/u/Willy/ Mozilla Hispano - Willyaguirre <https://www.mozilla-hispano.org/documentacion/Usuario:Willyaguirre>
