Thanks for explaining the process you use, Ian.

This is from GitHub help, but doesn't seem any easier than the way you
described:
https://help.github.com/articles/commenting-on-differences-between-files/.

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:29 AM Michael Crusoe <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Happy to clarify. The detailed (and rather hard to read, we apologize) full
> specification is at http://www.commonwl.org/v1.0/CommandLineTool.html
>
> In this instance the user guide is (correctly) referring to the
> construction of the command line. I was referring to the order of the
> fields within a CWL document which is what I think you were also talking
> about.
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:18 PM, GaleN <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Michael, thank you for the clarification! I was only going by "A
> Gentle
> > Introduction to the Common Workflow Language" (see link below). I'm
> > (obviously) new to CWL and don't yet know which resources are most
> > accurate, so thanks for jumping in to correct me!
> >
> > Thilina, What I meant was that the very last line at the end of section
> 2.2
> > in http://www.commonwl.org/draft-3/UserGuide.html says:
> >
> > "The baseCommand field always comes before parameters."
> >
> > However, Michael has clarified that the order doesn't matter.
> >
> > Gale
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:11 AM GaleN <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, I was looking at the older branch. I'll put future suggestions on
> > > GitHub.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016, 10:10 PM Thilina Manamgoda <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Yes it should.  What you meant by "Also, I notice in this CWL User
> > Guide (
> > >> http://www.commonwl.org/draft-3/UserGuide.html ) it says the
> > basecommand
> > >> field comes before the input and output parameters." ?
> > >>
> > >> Thilina.
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Michael R. Crusoe
> Community Engineer & Co-founder
> Common Workflow Language project
> https://impactstory.org/u/0000-0002-2961-9670
> [email protected]
> +40 720 781 765
> +1 480 627 9108
>

Reply via email to