[[ Ping mentors ]]
It would be better to report the state of the project (non-code)
particularly the swings in activity and the number of active committers.
This will put you in a better position going forward.
Starting on the Graduation Maturity Assessment is good. The code really
does need to be clean before graduation and the table says the code
isn't clean.
One option is to move out code for now and bring it in, clean, as
time/energy permits later. The project needs to be sustainable as a TLP.
Time-travel corrections below.
Andy
On 05/09/16 16:19, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
As we an important point of Incubator releases is to ensure the project
understands the ASF release process, including release review and voting,
IP management and licensing compatibility; as well as accepting
contributions. We believe we have gained that after effectively 8
software releases
In Apache-speak it was 3 VOTES : 2015-10, 2016-03, 2016-06
https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/taverna/source/
and 7 GSOC/student contributors.
We have however identified the need for a License Review of the remaining
git repositories that have not yet been formally released through the
Apache Incubator (e.g. to ensure ASF file headers), which we are completing at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TAVERNADEV/2016-09+License+review
dev@taverna mailing lists stats:
Jun 2016: 347
Jul 2016: 221
Aug 2015: 170
s/2015/2016/
users@taverna:
Jun 2016: 4
Jul 2016: 2
Aug 2015: 4
s/2015/2016/
