Thanks - corrected the time-travel coordinates. :) (My son just watched Back to the Future - and was like "WOOOOOOOO" when he realized that when they travel to "the future" 2015 - that's already our real past.. )
I added We might consider not including all of these repositories as we move towards graduation - we already have an alternative home https://github.com/taverna-extras for dormant extensions. And replaced: How has the project developed since the last report? We have seen an upsurge in activity with two successful GSOC projects as well as several new plugins from other students. Some of them have shown interest in continued contributions, which we must take into account for proposing new committers. This have admittedly taken some focus from the committers from the incubator graduation path - so we're now putting effort back into finishing our License Review. On 5 September 2016 at 17:16, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > [[ Ping mentors ]] > > It would be better to report the state of the project (non-code) > particularly the swings in activity and the number of active committers. > This will put you in a better position going forward. > > Starting on the Graduation Maturity Assessment is good. The code really does > need to be clean before graduation and the table says the code isn't clean. > > One option is to move out code for now and bring it in, clean, as > time/energy permits later. The project needs to be sustainable as a TLP. > > Time-travel corrections below. > > Andy > > > On 05/09/16 16:19, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >> >> As we an important point of Incubator releases is to ensure the project >> understands the ASF release process, including release review and >> voting, >> IP management and licensing compatibility; as well as accepting >> contributions. We believe we have gained that after effectively 8 >> software releases > > > In Apache-speak it was 3 VOTES : 2015-10, 2016-03, 2016-06 > >> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/taverna/source/ >> and 7 GSOC/student contributors. >> >> We have however identified the need for a License Review of the >> remaining >> git repositories that have not yet been formally released through the >> Apache Incubator (e.g. to ensure ASF file headers), which we are >> completing at >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TAVERNADEV/2016-09+License+review >> >> >> dev@taverna mailing lists stats: >> >> Jun 2016: 347 >> Jul 2016: 221 >> Aug 2015: 170 > > > s/2015/2016/ > >> >> users@taverna: >> >> Jun 2016: 4 >> Jul 2016: 2 >> Aug 2015: 4 > > > s/2015/2016/ > -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
