[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15629163#comment-15629163 ]
Daniel Kuppitz commented on TINKERPOP-1539: ------------------------------------------- Yup, but I don't think we should go too crazy with those tests. Complex queries in tests should still have a purpose and not just be there, because it's easy for us to write a 20+ step query. We should prepare the infrastructure for those tests and then add them on demand. A few good first candidates would be the queries I'm going to write for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1529. > Create a ComplexTraversalTest with crazy nested gnarly traversals. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: TINKERPOP-1539 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1539 > Project: TinkerPop > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: process, test-suite > Affects Versions: 3.2.3 > Reporter: Marko A. Rodriguez > > Our {{ProcessSuite}} has numerous tests verifying the semantics of the > various steps. Unfortunately, these tests are on simple traversals focused on > exposing the step in question in isolation. > It would be good to add {{ComplexTraversalTest}} to the {{ProcessSuite}} > which has traversals over the Grateful Dead graph (for complexity reasons) > doing: > 1. Numerous nests. > 2. Match/Select/Where complexities. > 3. Global side-effect access and unrolling and injecting. > 4. ... just a bunch of nasty stuff. > This will give us much more confidence as we add more strategies and > potentially, mess up our algebra which isn't exposed by the simple > "flat'-traversals we current test with. > [~dkuppitz] --- would you be interested in doing this? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)