[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15711890#comment-15711890
 ] 

Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-1539:
-----------------------------------------------

As a side, I do think we should add a new toy graph. One that has the following:

1. A Self-loop.
2. A vertex with no edges.
3. Edges of the same label with a different number of properties.

Perhaps [~dkuppitz] you could come up with a new toy graph data structure to 
add to our collection while doing this ticket?


> Create a ComplexTraversalTest with crazy nested gnarly traversals.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-1539
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1539
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: process, test-suite
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.3
>            Reporter: Marko A. Rodriguez
>            Assignee: Daniel Kuppitz
>
> Our {{ProcessSuite}} has numerous tests verifying the semantics of the 
> various steps. Unfortunately, these tests are on simple traversals focused on 
> exposing the step in question in isolation.
> It would be good to add {{ComplexTraversalTest}} to the {{ProcessSuite}} 
> which has traversals over the Grateful Dead graph (for complexity reasons) 
> doing:
> 1. Numerous nests.
> 2. Match/Select/Where complexities.
> 3. Global side-effect access and unrolling and injecting.
> 4. ... just a bunch of nasty stuff.
> This will give us much more confidence as we add more strategies and 
> potentially, mess up our algebra which isn't exposed by the simple 
> "flat'-traversals we current test with.
> [~dkuppitz] --- would you be interested in doing this?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to