I think a "Powered By" section would be ok - a directory of those leveraging TinkerPop in some way. I think it should stay simple though with just a listing/index of links with some bullets for a description that discuss what/how components of TinkerPop are used.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote: > I say we add a “Powered By” section to the website and list “leveraging > systems” as I wouldn’t call this a “TinkerPop Provider” like I would a more > “low level” graph database system…. > > If we open up “Powered By” it would allow us to show people the types of > products, projects, nick nacks and doo dads that are out there leveraging > TinkerPizzzop. > > Marko. > > > > On Mar 16, 2017, at 1:56 PM, Paul A. Jackson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I agree that the last bullet is not met. We bundle the Tinkerpop stack, > so the idea of version compatibility doesn't make sense. Instead, we offer > a platform that builds an ecosystem around the graph (ETL, fuzzy matching, > rich analysis client, etc). One feature is graph query. The users can > supply their own Gremlin queries, or they can use our graphical query > builder, which generates Gremlin. > > > > Anywho, what do you think? I concur we do not fit in the provider > bucket. But we have been around for 5 years. The offering is pretty mature > at this point. > > > > -Paul > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Robert Dale [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 1:50 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Requirements for listing as a vendor > > > > You should start here: http://tinkerpop.apache.org/policy.html > > > > It's not obvious to me that the last 3 bullets are met. > > > > Robert Dale > > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Paul A. Jackson <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> What are the requirements for being lists as a Gremlin provider? We > >> (Pitney Bowes) have an integrated product offering called Spectrum > >> Data Hub (you'll also see it listed as part of the Spectrum MDM > >> solution). The product is its own application server and we embed > >> Gremlin on top of embedded Neo4j using our own "blueprints" adapter. > >> So, access to the graph is from our own apps, rather that via a Gremlin > console or server. > >> > >> I don't know if this makes us a special case or not. Can you let us > >> know if we qualify and/or if there's anything we would need to do so? > >> > >> Here's a link to the product literature: > >> http://www.pitneybowes.com/us/ > >> customer-information-management/data-integration- > >> management/spectrum-data-hub-module.html > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -Paul > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> > >> > > > > ________________________________ > > > >
