This sounds great. At the same time, though, I was looking at other providers and judging from architecture diagrams (eg. https://grakn.ai/pages/documentation/the-fundamentals/grakn-architecture.html) some look similar to ours.
It may be the case that our web site is directed more towards business types than developers, is available through direct sales only, etc, rather than architectural differences? -Paul -----Original Message----- From: Marko Rodriguez [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 4:13 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Requirements for listing as a vendor I say we add a “Powered By” section to the website and list “leveraging systems” as I wouldn’t call this a “TinkerPop Provider” like I would a more “low level” graph database system…. If we open up “Powered By” it would allow us to show people the types of products, projects, nick nacks and doo dads that are out there leveraging TinkerPizzzop. Marko. > On Mar 16, 2017, at 1:56 PM, Paul A. Jackson <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree that the last bullet is not met. We bundle the Tinkerpop stack, so > the idea of version compatibility doesn't make sense. Instead, we offer a > platform that builds an ecosystem around the graph (ETL, fuzzy matching, rich > analysis client, etc). One feature is graph query. The users can supply their > own Gremlin queries, or they can use our graphical query builder, which > generates Gremlin. > > Anywho, what do you think? I concur we do not fit in the provider bucket. But > we have been around for 5 years. The offering is pretty mature at this point. > > -Paul > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Dale [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 1:50 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Requirements for listing as a vendor > > You should start here: http://tinkerpop.apache.org/policy.html > > It's not obvious to me that the last 3 bullets are met. > > Robert Dale > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Paul A. Jackson > <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> What are the requirements for being lists as a Gremlin provider? We >> (Pitney Bowes) have an integrated product offering called Spectrum >> Data Hub (you'll also see it listed as part of the Spectrum MDM >> solution). The product is its own application server and we embed >> Gremlin on top of embedded Neo4j using our own "blueprints" adapter. >> So, access to the graph is from our own apps, rather that via a Gremlin >> console or server. >> >> I don't know if this makes us a special case or not. Can you let us >> know if we qualify and/or if there's anything we would need to do so? >> >> Here's a link to the product literature: >> http://www.pitneybowes.com/us/ >> customer-information-management/data-integration- >> management/spectrum-data-hub-module.html >> >> Thanks, >> -Paul >> >> ________________________________ >> >> > > ________________________________ > ________________________________
