>  If we call them not "private" branches, but "feature" branches
The "feature" branches is a better name to state these branches.

If the feature branch could be created and named after passing a vote
which could prevent excessive branches and bad branch name, the
branches would be better managed.

On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 9:57 PM Konstantin Kolinko <knst.koli...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> пт, 11 окт. 2019 г. в 17:21, Rémy Maucherat <r...@apache.org>:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This vote is to regulate the use of branches in the official Tomcat
> repository beyond branches that are approved by the community such as 8.5.x
> and 7.0.x. It is possible to do development in private branches directly in
> the official Tomcat repository, as an alternative to using forks and pull
> requests.
> >
> > Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git repository
> ?
> > [x] Yes
> > [ ] No
>
> Certainly Yes. We must be able to conduct our business without relying
> on GitHub and without relying on its pull requests.
>
> If we call them not "private" branches, but "feature" branches - your
> email concerns will be the same, but many projects are using feature
> branches.
>
>
> I agree that titling a commit as "First draft" is a bad naming. I
> would like to see more elaborated commit message, with more context in
> it.
>
> If you remember when we were using Subversion, feature branches were
> used several times. E.g. I used them to backport testing framework to
> Tomcat 6. It generated a lot of emails, but their Subject line
> contained the root path of the commit, and in Subversion such path
> includes a branch name.
>
> > As a big github user, i expect main repo to not have unofficially
> supported code.
>
> Technically, the only supported code are the official releases that
> have passed a vote. Anything else is a work in progress.
>
> Best regards,
> Konstantin Kolinko
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to