чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 14:26, Rémy Maucherat <r...@apache.org>: > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:23 PM Konstantin Kolinko <knst.koli...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> ср, 5 февр. 2020 г. в 22:22, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>: >> > >> > The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.0.0.0-M1 release is now available for >> > voting. This is the first release of 10.0.0.x and is based on 9.0.31. >> >> It is odd to see 4 numbers in "10.0.0.0" instead of the usual 3 >> "10.0.0", "10.0.x". >> >> Was it intended? > > > Yes, it is all explained in the release plan for Jakarta. 10.0.0.x with > Jakarta EE 9 will be followed by the "real" release which will be 10.0.1 > (then 10.0.2, 10.0.3, etc) with Jakarta EE 10 (with stuff actually new in it).
Thank you for your response, but all this is rather confusing. 1). Why cannot we go with the usual 10.0.x for Jakarta EE 9, followed by 10.0.y for Jakarta EE 10, e.g. see Specifications page in the wiki like it was for WebSocket 1.0 and WebSocket 1.1 (since 8.0.13), and maintenance releases of the Servlet specification? [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Bi8lBg#Specifications-JavaAPIforWebSocket 2) I hope that somebody will update the following pages: https://tomcat.apache.org/whichversion.html https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TOMCAT/Tomcat+Versions https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TOMCAT/Specifications It is a lot better to stick to the existing numbering scheme (even if we would skip versions: e,g, Tomcat 10 for Jakarta EE 9 that stays as "alpha", followed by stable Tomcat 11 for Jakarta EE 10), rather that to invent a new one. Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
