Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 14:41 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: >> Remy Maucherat wrote: >>> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 12:49 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>> + markt: No change in the TCK results with this patch. We have the >>>> + same EL related failures we have without the patch. I'll >>>> + look into them as separate issues. >>> I fixed these by regenerating with a newer javacc and usage of the >>> lookahead flag (3 looked sensible). Don't know which one actually fixed >>> the problem. >> So how come those changes haven't been checked back in to svn? > > The problem looks minor (unless you're specifically interested in the > TCK at a given point in time). I would have to know what actually fixed > it, see if it works in Tomcat (it should) and then run the partial TCK > with just Tomcat (I don't know how to do that :( ). So that's a lot of > work, and I don't have time for it.
If you used a newer javacc and/or changed the lookahead for the 6.0.18 release that would have resulted in updated .java files. So again, my question is why aren't the updated .java files in svn. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
